翻訳と辞書 ・ Ewing Mitchell
・ Ewing Park, New Jersey
・ Ewing Public Schools
・ Ewing sarcoma breakpoint region 1
・ Ewing Seamount
・ Ewing System
・ Ewing T. Boles
・ Ewing Thomas Kerr
・ Ewing Township
・ Ewing Township, Boone County, Arkansas
・ Ewing Township, Franklin County, Illinois
・ Ewing Township, Holt County, Nebraska
・ Ewing Township, Michigan
・ Ewing Township, New Jersey
・ Ewing v. California
・ Ewing v. Goldstein
・ Ewing Werlein, Jr.
・ Ewing Y. Freeland
・ Ewing Yard (St. Louis MetroLink)
・ Ewing Young
・ Ewing's sarcoma
・ Ewing, Illinois
・ Ewing, Indiana
・ Ewing, Kentucky
・ Ewing, Missouri
・ Ewing, Nebraska
・ Ewing, Ohio
・ Ewing, Virginia
・ Ewing-Snell Ranch
・ Ewing/Carroll, Trenton, New Jersey
|
|
| Ewing v. Goldstein ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Ewing v. Goldstein
Ewing v. Goldstein (Cal. Ct. App. 2004) is a landmark court case that extended California mental health professional's duty to protect identifiable victims of potentially violent persons, as established by Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, to include acting upon communications from third parties that indicate a possible threat.〔
(【引用サイトリンク】publisher=Journal of the American Academy for Psychiatry and the Law )
〕
==Facts==
In 2001, former police officer Gene Colello received treatment from David Goldstein, after breaking up with his ex-girlfriend, who had become involved with Keith Ewing. During the course of treatment, Colello told his father about considering harming Ewing, which the father claims to have relayed to Goldstein. There was never any evidence that he did tell Goldstein or anyone else. Goldstein encouraged voluntary hospitalization but did not warn Ewing or law enforcement officials of Colello's hostile intentions, because of not having the information that the father withheld. When Colello was released, he murdered Ewing and then committed suicide.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Ewing v. Goldstein」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|